Skip to main content

A Survey of Research on Ibn Khaldun’s Socio-Historical Philosophy since the 19th Century

Feng Jiewen’s article, A Survey of Research on Ibn Khaldun’s Socio-Historical Philosophy since the 19th Century, offers a comprehensive and carefully structured survey of more than a century and a half of scholarship on Ibn Khaldun’s socio-historical philosophy. Drawing on a broad corpus of European, Middle Eastern, and Chinese academic works, the author maps the development of Ibn Khaldun studies from early manuscript collection and translation projects to contemporary, specialized analyses of his intellectual legacy. As a review essay, the article succeeds in presenting both the breadth of international research and the relative gaps within Chinese scholarship.

The first major contribution of the article is its meticulous reconstruction of the publication and translation history of the Muqaddimah, particularly the first book of Kitāb al-‘Ibar, where Ibn Khaldun develops his foundational concepts. Feng traces the emergence of interest in Europe during the 19th century, when scholars first encountered and translated selections of the Muqaddimah. He documents the proliferation of editions and translations in Arabic, Turkish, French, English, German, Hebrew, Persian, Urdu, and other languages. This section is especially valuable because it demonstrates how the textual transmission of the Muqaddimah shaped the formation of modern Ibn Khaldun studies.

A second component of the article surveys general studies of Ibn Khaldun’s social theory and philosophy of history. Here, Feng highlights the major works that identify Ibn Khaldun as a precursor to modern sociology, often comparing him to Machiavelli, Comte, Marx, and Durkheim. This scholarship emphasizes key elements of Ibn Khaldun’s thought—such as ‘asabiyya (group solidarity), cyclical theories of state formation, the sociology of Bedouin and urban life, and environmental and economic determinants of social development. Feng’s summary underscores that, by the mid-20th century, many Western scholars regarded Ibn Khaldun as one of the earliest thinkers to articulate a systematic, quasi-scientific analysis of society and history.

The article then turns to thematic studies, reviewing specialized research on Ibn Khaldun’s views of civilization, religion, economic theory, methodology, and human nature. Feng shows that scholars have examined, for example, Ibn Khaldun’s understanding of civilizational cycles, his nuanced critique of Sufi mysticism, his analyses of taxation, production, and population, and his distinctive methodological stance, which blends empirical observation with philosophical reasoning. This section effectively conveys how Ibn Khaldun’s work lends itself to multidisciplinary inquiry—from sociology and economics to political theory, historiography, and religious studies.

One of the article’s most important observations concerns the disparity between international scholarship and Chinese scholarship. While European and Middle Eastern scholars have produced generations of studies, Chinese researchers only began sustained engagement with Ibn Khaldun in the 1980s. Feng notes that although several articles and book chapters exist, there remains no complete Chinese translation of the Muqaddimah’s first book, and studies tend to be introductory rather than analytically innovative. The author thus calls for deeper engagement, both in translation work and in theoretical research.

The article concludes by emphasizing the contemporary relevance of Ibn Khaldun’s socio-historical analysis for understanding the structural challenges faced by developing societies. Feng argues that studying Ibn Khaldun is not an exercise in historical curiosity; rather, it offers analytical tools for examining issues such as governance, social cohesion, economic development, and political cycles in the modern world.

Overall, Feng Jiewen’s survey is a valuable and informative contribution. It synthesizes an impressive amount of scholarship, clearly identifies research trends, and highlights areas in need of further development—particularly within Chinese academia. For readers seeking an overview of Ibn Khaldun studies over the past two centuries, this article provides a clear and authoritative guide.


Feng Jiewen, “A Survey of Research on Ibn Khaldun’s Socio-Historical Philosophy since the 19th Century,” West Asia and Africa 2012, no. 2.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment


Search Ibn Khaldun Today

Reading now....

Situating Ibn Khaldun and the Meaning of Civilization in Modern Scholarship

The study of civilization has long oscillated between two dominant approaches: one that treats civilizations as culturally bounded, historically plural entities, and another that emphasizes systemic integration, structural dominance, and global convergence. Ibn Khaldun and the Meaning of Civilization enters this field by reconstructing Ibn Khaldun’s concepts of ʿumrān and ḥaḍāra as a unified analytical framework capable of resolving tensions that have persisted across modern civilizational theory. Rather than offering a rebuttal to any single school, the article reframes the problem itself: it argues that much contemporary disagreement stems from a categorical confusion between culture, identity, and civilization. Modern civilizational scholarship has been shaped decisively by works that emphasize plurality. From Oswald Spengler’s organicist vision of multiple, self-contained civilizations, to Arnold J. Toynbee’s comparative study of civilizational rise and decline, the dominant p...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Grammar of Systems Thinking in Ibn Khaldun’s Writings

Ibn Khaldun’s Systemic Language in the Muqaddima Ahmed E. Souaiaia, University of Iowa Here, I examine Ibn Khaldun’s Muqaddima through what I call the grammar of systems thinking, arguing that his writings exhibit a sophisticated systemic logic articulated through language, method, and explanatory practice rather than through formal theory. Addressing the common anachronism objection—that identifying Ibn Khaldun as a systems thinker projects a modern framework onto a pre-modern author—the cited evidence demonstrates that Ibn Khaldun consistently employed a vocabulary and analytical structure grounded in order (tartīb), rules (aḥkām), causality (asbāb and musabbabāt), connection (ittiṣāl), organization (intidām), and instrumentalization (istidhār)—some of the key principles of the systems thinking framework. His concepts function together as a coherent grammar governing his explanations of natural phenomena, human action, economic activity, and political power. Ibn Khaldun integrates co...
Post a Comment
Read more

Knowledge in the Shadow of Power

Ibn Khaldun and the Systems of Intellectual Survival By Ahmed E. Souaiaia Abstract This article examines Ibn Khaldun’s striking praise of political authority in the introduction to al-Muqaddima , arguing that it reflects neither hypocrisy nor routine courtly convention, but a historically informed strategy shaped by the structural conditions of knowledge preservation. Drawing on Ibn Khaldun’s theory of the state ( al-dawla ) as an emergent system grounded in ʿumrān —a concept encompassing social cohesion and civilizational development—as well as patronage and institutional continuity, the article demonstrates that knowledge production is inseparable from power. By situating Ibn Khaldun’s choices alongside earlier episodes of intellectual suppression, most notably the fate of Ibn Rushd, and his own experiences of political instability, exile, and imprisonment, proximity to power is reframed as calculated accommodation rather than ideological submission. Extending the analysis to the pre...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ibn Khaldun’s Systems Thinking Approach to Property and Political Legitimacy

Abstract This article examines Ibn Khaldun’s foundational economic principle that active human work—expressed through the ever-present, transformative agency of the hand ( yad )—produces rightful ownership ( kasb ) that cannot be surrendered except through compensation ( ʿiwaḍ ). This dynamic relationship between labor, possession, and reciprocal exchange not only legitimates individual property but also establishes the systemic conditions under which the State may impose taxes without descending into injustice. In grounding political and fiscal legitimacy in the natural processes of human work rather than in inherited legal categories, Ibn Khaldun articulates a worldview that sets him apart from classical Muslim jurists and places him in a category of his own within Islamic intellectual history. This same systems-thinking framework—through which he analyzes value, authority, and historical change—has rendered him profoundly misunderstood or entirely un-understood by many modern scho...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Bridge of Becoming: Reimagining Work and Capital through Ibn Khaldun and Western Economic Thought

 Abstract This study reimagines the foundational role of work in economic life through a comparative analysis of Ibn Khaldun and key Western economic thinkers, including Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Max Weber, and John Maynard Keynes. Drawing on the Systems Thinking Framework, the research positions work not merely as an economic activity but as a structuring principle that shapes civilizations, value systems, and social organization. Unlike modern paradigms that prioritize capital accumulation, this study explores how Ibn Khaldun’s pre-Enlightenment perspective centers work as the original and enduring source of value, production, and moral order. By contrasting this with Western theories that progressively decouple wealth from labor, the paper proposes a re-evaluation of economic systems toward a more equitable, sustainable, and human-centered model. The study also underscores the determinant role of the State in shaping dominant worldviews, offering a critical perspective on the i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Recovering Ibn Khaldun’s Cultural Specificity

In his 2005 article, “ Theorizing from Within: Ibn Khaldun and His Political Culture ,” anthropologist Lawrence Rosen offers a nuanced and culturally grounded critique of the dominant Western reception of Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406). Rather than celebrating the North African polymath as a proto-sociologist or an early architect of grand historical theory—an approach common among both Orientalist and postcolonial scholars—Rosen insists that Ibn Khaldun must be understood first and foremost as an Arab-Muslim thinker whose theoretical insights emerged from, and were inseparable from, the specific political and cultural milieu of his time. This essay reviews Rosen’s central arguments, evaluates his methodological contribution, and situates his intervention within broader debates about cross-cultural intellectual history and the politics of comparative theory. Rosen’s primary concern is with what he sees as a persistent misreading of Ibn Khaldun in Western scholarship. Too often, he argues, Ibn...
Post a Comment
Read more

Toynbee and Ibn Khaldun

Robert Irwin’s 1997 article “ Toynbee and Ibn Khaldun ,” published in Middle Eastern Studies, offers a nuanced and erudite comparative analysis of the historical philosophies of Arnold J. Toynbee (1889–1975) and Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406). Irwin’s central aim is not merely to juxtapose the two thinkers but to interrogate the nature and limits of Toynbee’s engagement with Ibn Khaldun’s Muqaddima, exposing both the productive affinities and the profound distortions that arise when Toynbee appropriates the North African historian as an intellectual forebear. The essay functions simultaneously as a historiographical critique, a study in intellectual transmission, and a subtle reflection on the politics of historical interpretation in the twentieth century. Irwin begins by situating Toynbee historically and intellectually: as a British scholar writing in the turbulent interwar and postwar decades, shaped by the collapse of empires, the rise of nationalisms, and his experiences at Chatham House...
Post a Comment
Read more