On Franz Rosenthal, “Ibn Khaldun in His Time,” Journal of Asian and African Studies 18, no. 3 (1983): 166–178.
Franz Rosenthal’s “Ibn Khaldun in His Time” is a concise yet erudite study that situates Ibn Khaldun’s intellectual and political career within the turbulent social and historical landscape of the fourteenth-century Maghrib. Known as one of the preeminent translators and interpreters of The Muqaddima, Rosenthal brings to this article a depth of philological mastery and historical sensitivity that allows him to illuminate how Ibn Khaldun’s thought was not an abstract philosophical exercise but an intervention shaped by—and responding to—the immediate pressures of his era.
Rosenthal begins by mapping the political fragmentation of North Africa during Ibn Khaldun’s lifetime: dynastic instability, incessant tribal conflict, and shifting centers of power. Rather than treating Ibn Khaldun as a solitary genius outside his milieu, Rosenthal underscores how his itinerant career—moving among courts, serving in administrative roles, participating in diplomacy, and experiencing imprisonment and exile—offered firsthand exposure to the very social dynamics he would later theorize. This contextual framing is one of the article’s strengths, highlighting the symbiotic relationship between lived experience and intellectual production in Ibn Khaldun’s oeuvre.
A central theme of the article is the interplay between Ibn Khaldun’s personal ambitions and the constraints of the political order. Rosenthal argues that Ibn Khaldun’s recurring attempts to secure stable patronage reflect both the opportunities and the perils faced by scholars whose fortunes depended on unstable rulers and factional rivalries. In juxtaposing these biographical details with key concepts from the Muqaddima—such as ʿasabiyya, the rise and decline of dynasties, and the sociology of state power—Rosenthal suggests that Ibn Khaldun’s theoretical insights were grounded in patterns he repeatedly observed in the courts he served.
Rosenthal’s analysis is particularly valuable in how it balances recognition of Ibn Khaldun’s originality with attention to the intellectual traditions of his time. The article resists the common romanticization of Ibn Khaldun as “ahead of his time” in a purely modern sense; instead, Rosenthal positions him as a product of classical Islamic scholarship who nevertheless reoriented inherited concepts toward a more empirical and systematic understanding of historical processes.
If there is a limitation to the article, it lies in its brevity. Certain themes—such as Ibn Khaldun’s relationship to earlier historiographical models, or the reception of his ideas among contemporaries—are only touched upon, perhaps due to the constraints of the article’s format. Still, Rosenthal gestures toward these broader questions in ways that invite further inquiry.
Overall, “Ibn Khaldun in His Time” is a succinct and insightful contribution that remains valuable for scholars of Islamic intellectual history, historiography, and the social and political world of the medieval Maghrib. Rosenthal’s ability to synthesize biography, context, and textual interpretation makes the article a reliable entry point for understanding how Ibn Khaldun’s life shaped the formation of one of the most remarkable works of social thought in world history.
article: Ibn Khaldun in His Time
Comments
Post a Comment