Skip to main content

Processing Theory in Islamic Thought

In "Processing Theory in Islamic Thought: A Comparative Analysis of al-Mawardi and Ibn Khaldun with Implications for Islamic Education," published in the November 2025 issue of Tadibia Islamika, Muhammad Farid Asysyauqi undertakes a sophisticated re-examination of medieval Islamic scholarship through the lens of modern cognitive psychology. The article moves beyond the traditional bifurcation of al-Mawardi as merely a jurist and Ibn Khaldun as solely a sociologist, positing instead that both scholars constructed intricate theories of information processing that prefigure contemporary educational psychology. By employing Optimal Matching Analysis (OMA) to dissect classical texts like Adab al-Dunya wa al-Din and al-Muqaddimah, Asysyauqi constructs a compelling narrative that bridges the gap between twelfth-century theology and twenty-first-century information processing theory.

The narrative begins with al-Mawardi, whose contribution is reframed from simple moral instruction to a complex theory of "Depth Level Processing". Asysyauqi argues that al-Mawardi’s renowned emphasis on adab (etiquette) and linguistic precision is actually a cognitive strategy for encoding information. In this view, the jurist anticipates modern psycholinguistics by asserting that language—specifically the articulation (faṣāḥah) and rhetoric (balāghah) of the speaker—serves as the primary filter for cognitive entry. The review elucidates how al-Mawardi distinguishes between surface-level processing (phonology and sound) and deep structural processing (semantics and meaning), aligning his medieval pedagogy with the Levels of Processing Theory found in modern psychology. Furthermore, the author highlights al-Mawardi’s prescription of mudhākarah (remembrance) and munāẓarah (disputation) not merely as scholarly habits, but as mechanisms of "maintenance rehearsal" and "elaborative rehearsal" necessary to move information from working memory into permanent knowledge.

In stark contrast to al-Mawardi’s linguistic "software," the article presents Ibn Khaldun as the architect of cognitive "hardware." Asysyauqi portrays Ibn Khaldun as a proto-neuroscientist who maps the physical geography of thought, offering a structural model that aligns with the modern dual-storage paradigm of memory. The narrative details Ibn Khaldun’s fascination with the anatomy of the brain, which he divides into three functional zones: the front brain for sensory registration (hiss al-mushtarak), the midbrain for executive processing (quwwat al-fikr), and the back brain for perception and long-term storage (al-hāfiẓah). Asysyauqi perceptively notes that Ibn Khaldun’s five-stage processing model is arguably more nuanced than some twentieth-century theories, such as those by Atkinson and Shiffrin, because it explicitly accounts for the translation of sensory data into "imagined" forms before they are processed intellectually. This section of the article compellingly argues that Ibn Khaldun viewed the learner not as a passive vessel, but as an active agent whose "power of thinking" serves as a biological imperative to construct meaning from sensory input.

Ultimately, the article succeeds in synthesizing these two distinct intellectual traditions into a cohesive history of Islamic educational theory. Asysyauqi concludes that while al-Mawardi focuses on the quality of the signal—ensuring clarity and semantic depth through language—Ibn Khaldun focuses on the mechanism of the receiver, detailing how the brain physically sorts and stores that signal. The result is a rich comparative study that validates the sophistication of classical Islamic thought, suggesting that the "modern" understanding of learning as a complex interplay of linguistic encoding and biological storage has deep roots in the intellectual heritage of the medieval Muslim world.

Article Title: Processing Theory in Islamic Thought: A Comparative Analysis of Al-Mawardi and Ibn Khaldun with Implications for Islamic Education Author: Muhammad Farid Asysyauqi Journal: Tadibia Islamika, Vol. 5, No. 2 (November 2025)


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment


Search Ibn Khaldun Today

Reading now....

Situating Ibn Khaldun and the Meaning of Civilization in Modern Scholarship

The study of civilization has long oscillated between two dominant approaches: one that treats civilizations as culturally bounded, historically plural entities, and another that emphasizes systemic integration, structural dominance, and global convergence. Ibn Khaldun and the Meaning of Civilization enters this field by reconstructing Ibn Khaldun’s concepts of ʿumrān and ḥaḍāra as a unified analytical framework capable of resolving tensions that have persisted across modern civilizational theory. Rather than offering a rebuttal to any single school, the article reframes the problem itself: it argues that much contemporary disagreement stems from a categorical confusion between culture, identity, and civilization. Modern civilizational scholarship has been shaped decisively by works that emphasize plurality. From Oswald Spengler’s organicist vision of multiple, self-contained civilizations, to Arnold J. Toynbee’s comparative study of civilizational rise and decline, the dominant p...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Bridge of Becoming: Reimagining Work and Capital through Ibn Khaldun and Western Economic Thought

 Abstract This study reimagines the foundational role of work in economic life through a comparative analysis of Ibn Khaldun and key Western economic thinkers, including Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Max Weber, and John Maynard Keynes. Drawing on the Systems Thinking Framework, the research positions work not merely as an economic activity but as a structuring principle that shapes civilizations, value systems, and social organization. Unlike modern paradigms that prioritize capital accumulation, this study explores how Ibn Khaldun’s pre-Enlightenment perspective centers work as the original and enduring source of value, production, and moral order. By contrasting this with Western theories that progressively decouple wealth from labor, the paper proposes a re-evaluation of economic systems toward a more equitable, sustainable, and human-centered model. The study also underscores the determinant role of the State in shaping dominant worldviews, offering a critical perspective on the i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Knowledge in the Shadow of Power

Ibn Khaldun and the Systems of Intellectual Survival By Ahmed E. Souaiaia Abstract This article examines Ibn Khaldun’s striking praise of political authority in the introduction to al-Muqaddima , arguing that it reflects neither hypocrisy nor routine courtly convention, but a historically informed strategy shaped by the structural conditions of knowledge preservation. Drawing on Ibn Khaldun’s theory of the state ( al-dawla ) as an emergent system grounded in ʿumrān —a concept encompassing social cohesion and civilizational development—as well as patronage and institutional continuity, the article demonstrates that knowledge production is inseparable from power. By situating Ibn Khaldun’s choices alongside earlier episodes of intellectual suppression, most notably the fate of Ibn Rushd, and his own experiences of political instability, exile, and imprisonment, proximity to power is reframed as calculated accommodation rather than ideological submission. Extending the analysis to the pre...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Grammar of Systems Thinking in Ibn Khaldun’s Writings

Ibn Khaldun’s Systemic Language in the Muqaddima Ahmed E. Souaiaia, University of Iowa Here, I examine Ibn Khaldun’s Muqaddima through what I call the grammar of systems thinking, arguing that his writings exhibit a sophisticated systemic logic articulated through language, method, and explanatory practice rather than through formal theory. Addressing the common anachronism objection—that identifying Ibn Khaldun as a systems thinker projects a modern framework onto a pre-modern author—the cited evidence demonstrates that Ibn Khaldun consistently employed a vocabulary and analytical structure grounded in order (tartīb), rules (aḥkām), causality (asbāb and musabbabāt), connection (ittiṣāl), organization (intidām), and instrumentalization (istidhār)—some of the key principles of the systems thinking framework. His concepts function together as a coherent grammar governing his explanations of natural phenomena, human action, economic activity, and political power. Ibn Khaldun integrates co...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ibn Khaldun’s Systems Thinking Approach to Property and Political Legitimacy

Abstract This article examines Ibn Khaldun’s foundational economic principle that active human work—expressed through the ever-present, transformative agency of the hand ( yad )—produces rightful ownership ( kasb ) that cannot be surrendered except through compensation ( ʿiwaḍ ). This dynamic relationship between labor, possession, and reciprocal exchange not only legitimates individual property but also establishes the systemic conditions under which the State may impose taxes without descending into injustice. In grounding political and fiscal legitimacy in the natural processes of human work rather than in inherited legal categories, Ibn Khaldun articulates a worldview that sets him apart from classical Muslim jurists and places him in a category of his own within Islamic intellectual history. This same systems-thinking framework—through which he analyzes value, authority, and historical change—has rendered him profoundly misunderstood or entirely un-understood by many modern scho...
Post a Comment
Read more

What does it mean to think of "Ibn Khaldun as a Social Holist Philosopher"

The article "Ibn Khaldun as a Social Holist Philosopher" presents a compelling exploration of the philosophical underpinnings of Ibn Khaldun's social theory, particularly through his concept of Asabiyyah . The author situates Ibn Khaldun within the broader discourse of social holism, drawing comparisons between his ideas and those of Ferdinand Tönnies, as well as with key thinkers in the Western tradition such as Aristotle, Marx, and contemporary philosophers like Philip Pettit. Through this comparative analysis, the paper asserts that Ibn Khaldun offers a rich, nuanced perspective on human sociality that bridges Islamic and Western philosophical traditions. Central to the article is the thesis that Ibn Khaldun’s social philosophy, specifically his concept of Asabiyyah , offers a form of social holism that emphasizes the interdependence of individuals within a community. The paper begins by framing social holism in contrast to social atomism, the latter asserting that in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Recovering Ibn Khaldun’s Cultural Specificity

In his 2005 article, “ Theorizing from Within: Ibn Khaldun and His Political Culture ,” anthropologist Lawrence Rosen offers a nuanced and culturally grounded critique of the dominant Western reception of Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406). Rather than celebrating the North African polymath as a proto-sociologist or an early architect of grand historical theory—an approach common among both Orientalist and postcolonial scholars—Rosen insists that Ibn Khaldun must be understood first and foremost as an Arab-Muslim thinker whose theoretical insights emerged from, and were inseparable from, the specific political and cultural milieu of his time. This essay reviews Rosen’s central arguments, evaluates his methodological contribution, and situates his intervention within broader debates about cross-cultural intellectual history and the politics of comparative theory. Rosen’s primary concern is with what he sees as a persistent misreading of Ibn Khaldun in Western scholarship. Too often, he argues, Ibn...
Post a Comment
Read more